Social Media & Education

Much of the text below is excerpted from Jane Hart’s web sites.

“Jane Hart is an independent consultant, speaker and writer. She is an internationally known specialist in the use of social media for learning and working.” I’ve linked to some of her “best of” lists elsewhere on this site; you’ll find a few similar links towards the end of this post.

“Jane … recently established the Social Learning Centre to focus exclusively on how to encourage and support the use of social media for continuous collaborative learning.” It includes a “range of special interest groups for ongoing, continuous updates and discussions on specific social learning topics.” If you’re interested in these groups, you’ll need to register at the site. I joined the groups “Social Media and Education”, “Google applications for learning”, “Google+ and Learning”.

Here are some recent collections she’s put together:

Social Learning: Key resources from January
Here is my pick of 10 articles about social learning since my last posting just before Christmas. I have listed them below in chronological order, and also added a short quote from each of them to give you a flavour of what each is about. If you want to read further articles you will find many more that I have saved in my 2012 Reading List.

Top 100 Articles of 2011
This is my 4th Annual Top 100 Articles list.
From nearly 500 links to articles, blog posts, slideshows, reports and (this year also) infographics that I saved in my 2011 Reading List, here are the 100 that I enjoyed and/or impressed me most in 2011.  This year I’ve added a quote beneath each link to give you a taster of what it is about.  As you will see  for me this year’s reading has not been about social media tools per se, but how they are impacting personal, professional and organisational learning practices and behaviours.

Top 20 Tools 2007-2011
Combined results from 5 years of “Top 100” lists. I found the ordering interesting. Twitter, top of the list for the last 3 years, came in 9th (was 43rd in 2007). YouTube, in second place the last 2 years, came in 7th. The top 3 places went to Skype, WordPress and Google Docs – all in the top 15 for 5 years running. In 4th place is Delicious, in the top 4 for 2007-2010, but dropped to 24th place in 2011.

Collaboration 1: Collaboration is the key influence in the quality of teaching

One of seven posts about collaboration and why it nearly always fails to deliver results, inspired by Morten T Hansen’s Collaboration. [I’ve pulled together all seven posts in a PDF, Collaboration & Quality of Teaching.]

The quality of the teacher is the number one factor in the improvement of an education system, collaboration is the key factor in improving the quality of that teacher.

Collaboration helps increase academic success, yet most collaboration doesn’t work. The Microsoft-supported ITL Research revealed in a large-scale study:

“Innovative teaching happens more in environments where teachers collaborate. In schools where teachers report more frequent collaboration with one another on teaching practices, innovative teaching scores tend to be higher… Teachers told us that collaboration can be an important mechanism for sharing teaching practices and for mutual support toward improving them.”

Anecdotally, this has also been the prime driver in the continued growth and success of the TeachMeet movement since 2006, and EdCamps since then, providing environments in which teachers, for whatever reason, feel comfortable sharing. We’ll explore over this series of posts what makes collaboration work sometimes, and fail others.

All highly recommended.


About Sigurd

Moved to rural Vermont in 1998, recently semi-retired. Intellect-oriented person (I spend a lot of time in my mind, have worked to broaden, regularly, the boundaries of what I pay attention to). One of my current interests is Goethe's approach to understanding the structures of the world (Science) and how it is different from Newton's approach. Goethe tried to stay open to what more the world might tell him of its nature, whereas Newton conceived frameworks that them became a window through which nature is viewed and understood.
This entry was posted in Education, Google Apps, Technology Integration, Web 2.0 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s